How can I defend a refusal/fail to provide breath sample charge?

>>>How can I defend a refusal/fail to provide breath sample charge?

If you were charged with a refusal/fail to provide a breath sample, you face the same potential sentence that you would otherwise face if you had provided a sample and blown Over 80, or been charged with Impaired Driving. There are many ways in which a refusal or failure to provide a breath sample can occur. Likewise, there are numerous possible defences.

The best thing you can do to fight this type of charge is to retain a criminal defence lawyer with experience in DUI defence. In the interim, there may be some steps you can take to improve your chances of a successful defence. For example, if you have a medical condition that prevented you from providing a proper sample, it will be of assistance for you to obtain medical documentation that confirms this inability as soon as possible. Below is a write up about several key points in most DUI investigations where a refusal might occur.

1. Do I have to provide a breath sample at the roadside?

If you are being asked to provide a sample at the police station, you always have the choice to decide whether or not to comply. If you do not comply, and refuse to provide a sample, you will be charged with the Criminal Code offence of refusing to provide a sample. If you try to comply, but fail to provide a sample without reasonable excuse, you will also be charged with refusing/failing to provide a sample. The penalty for refusing/failing to provide a sample is the same as if you are convicted for blowing over the legal limit.

2. Do I have the right to call a lawyer at the roadside?

There are very few situations in Canadian Criminal Law where a civilian might be required to incriminate themselves without first being advised of and/or allowed to contact counsel. Unfortunately, the impaired driving roadside breath testing protocol is one of them.  The difficulty is that not only do people not realize they are not entitled to that constitutional protection at the roadside, but they are also forced to decide whether or not to potentially incriminate themselves (by providing a breath sample) in the absence of independent legal advice.

Despite a lack of immediate legal advice, most people end up following police instruction and providing a breath sample as directed. Too many unfortunate situations nevertheless occur wherein people refuse to blow, either because they believe they are entitled to call a lawyer first, or because in the absence of legal advice they make the wrong choice.

To be clear, you do not have the right to call a lawyer before blowing at the roadside. Typically, your right to contact a lawyer crystallizes when you are physically or psychologically detained by the police. This right is suspended, however, while the police conduct their investigation to determine if they have sufficient grounds to arrest you for impaired driving. The Supreme Court of Canada has approved this suspension of counsel rights during the investigation as there is a pressing and substantial need to investigate impaired driving.

If you are being investigated for impaired driving, and are required to provide a roadside sample pursuant to this investigation, you will not be entitled to contact a lawyer unless you provide a “fail” sample and are arrested for impaired driving. If you have already found yourself in this situation and made the wrong decision by refusing, there are still numerous defences available, and it is important to consult one of our lawyers, or a lawyer in your area regarding the unique circumstances of your case.

3. Do I have to provide a breath sample at the police station?

While technically, you always have a choice as to whether to blow or not, in the sense that the police can’t force you to blow, legally speaking it’s not much of a choice. Assuming the police make a lawful demand that you provide a breath sample at the roadside, you are legally obligated to comply. You can be charged for either “failing to comply” or “refusing to comply” with a breath demand pursuant to s. 254(5) of the Criminal Code.  The offence can be committed in one of two ways, generally speaking.

The first way the offence is typically committed is through an oral refusal. The driver, for whatever reason, says to the officer expressly that he/she will not provide a breath sample. Often this type of statement is made because of an erroneous understanding of one’s legal rights. It’s not uncommon for our criminal defence lawyers to review police disclosure to see drivers say “I’m not blowing without calling a lawyer,” or “I’m not blowing because I wasn’t driving,” or something similar. Equally often people refuse to provide a roadside breath sample because they believe refusing to blow will give them a better chance of winning the case, or that blowing over at the roadside is worse than refusing.

The second way the offence is committed is by trying, but failing to provide a proper breath sample. It is not uncommon for people to make numerous attempts to blow without ever providing a proper breath sample.  Quite frequently people have legitimate difficulty in providing a sample, such as Asthma, panic attack, extreme cold, inadequate instruction, instrument failure, injury, etc. This type of explanation can constitute a reasonable excuse—and therefore a defence—to failing to provide a breath sample. Not uncommonly, however, the police describe, or sometimes even record, people clearly pretending to blow. The police might describe observing sucking instead of blowing, putting tongue or lips into the straw to block it, blowing past the straw, stopping blowing after only a second or two, or not blowing at all.

Practically speaking, not only is it illegal to willfully fail or refuse a valid breath demand, but there is actually little, if any advantage to doing so. One of the things people often misunderstand is that blowing over at the roadside is actually far less incriminating than refusing or failing to provide a breath sample.  That is, blowing over on a roadside breath test can only be used to give the police reasonable grounds to arrest/detain you for further investigation. The fact that you blew over cannot be introduced in court to prove that your blood alcohol level (BAC) was over the legal limit. Blowing over does not constitute an offence. Contrast that with a failing/refusing to provide a breath sample. If you fail/refuse to blow, that action constitutes an offence. There is no need for further investigation because the offence has now been established through the fail/refusal.

Although we hope this chapter is informative on whether you have to provide a roadside breath sample, if you are reading this you have likely already been charged with this criminal offence. Despite what might appear to be a bleak outlook at this point, there are nevertheless numerous defences to a charge of failing or refusing to provide a roadside breath sample. Every case is different, so it’s important to have a criminal defence lawyer carefully review the circumstances of your particular case to determine how to proceed.

For specific information regarding your claim, please select the location that's closest to you.


Glowing Reviews From Our Clients

Excellent service! I would highly recommend going with this team. If I ever need assistance with anything of this manner again, I wouldn’t hesitate to call or email the team at Oykhman Criminal Defence again.



Everyone was very professional and understanding. They explained everything and put me at ease. Any question I had were answered right. If you need help I’d highly recommend this law firm.




Disclaimer: All results of cases handled by the lawyer/firm are not provided. The results provided are not necessarily representative of results obtained by the lawyer/firm or of the experience of all clients or others with the lawyer/firm. Every case is different, and each client’s case must be evaluated and handled on its own merits.

All our 30-60 minute free consultations are conducted with one of our Criminal Defence Lawyers and include the following steps:

  1. Gathering of some personal information about you, such as your level of education, occupation, and citizenship status. This information can be crucial for building your defence and seeking a resolution with the Crown Prosecutor;
  2. Careful review of all documents you received from the police. We will explain what each document is, and what you can expect from and need to do for all upcoming appearances;
  3. Critical review of your recollection of events, and any supporting materials you choose to bring with you. This step helps us identify possible defences and avenues for further investigation; and
  4. Discussion of the court process, our fee structure, and what we can do to help.

Beyond these steps, we would be happy to tell you more about us, and answer any questions you may have. If you chose to retain us to help you, we will immediately provide an overview of what steps we plan to take next, and suggestions as to what you should do to improve your chances of a successful outcome.

For the free initial consultation to be as productive as possible, you should bring (or email in advance) the following materials:

  • A written statement (preferably typed) outlining your version of events;
  • All documents that you have been given by the court or by the police;
  • Any disclosure you have received;
  • Photo ID; and
  • Any supporting documents, such as photographs, emails, texts, phone records, medical records, receipts, etc.

Ideally, you will have prepared a copy of these materials for us to keep, but if not, we can always photocopy them during the consultation.

We offer flexible payment options and structures designed to meet our clients’ individual needs. Our lawyers accept all major credit cards, bank drafts, money orders, email money transfers (e-transfers) and, of course, cash.

If you decide to retain us after the free initial consultation, all we need is a retainer (down payment) to get started. The rest of the fee payments for the case can be spaced out over time. We can set you up on a monthly or bi-monthly payment plan, and process payments over the telephone or by email to make it easy for you.

The cost of a criminal defence lawyer will depend on several factors, including:

  1. how complex your case is,
  2. how serious the charges are, and
  3. how experienced the Criminal Defence lawyer is.

The fees of a competent Criminal Defence Lawyer will typically range into the thousands of dollars. The good news is that only a fraction of that amount is due initially. We offer flexible payment schedules so thefees can be paid in monthly installments.

Additionally, we offer flat rate fees, with no hidden costs. It is our standard practice to review all the costs during the free initial consultation. This means you will know exactly what our services cost at the outset and can make an informed decision about how to proceed.