Identity Theft (s. 402.2, s. 403) Charges in Canada: Offences, Defences, Punishments

By Last Updated: January 5, 2023

What is Identity Theft?

Identity Theft Charges In CanadaIdentity theft and identity fraud are both offences covered under s. 402.2 and s. 403 of the Criminal Code.

Identity theft, under s. 402.2, is when a person possesses another person’s identity information, with the intent of using that identity information in order to commit an indictable offence. These offences are listed below in full but include things like forgery, perjury, credit card theft, and fraud. Identity information refers to anything that is typically used to identify a person or purport to identify them. Items/information such as usernames and passwords, credit card information, SIN, driver’s license number, and signatures are all examples of information that, when possessed with the intent to use for a crime, would qualify as identity theft.

Identity fraud, under s. 403 of the Criminal Code, is one of the offences included under s. 402.2.

Identity fraud occurs when the accused, who is in possession of another (living or dead) person’s information and uses it to impersonate that person in order to gain some kind of advantage from it for themselves or another person, to avoid arrest, or to cause some type of disadvantage to the person whose identity has been stolen.

In terms of differentiating these two offences, identity theft occurs when the identity information is stolen, and police have reason to believe it might be used in the commission of an offence. Therefore, you could be convicted of identity theft for simply possessing the information and intending to use it, even if you have not done so yet. On the other hand, you cannot be convicted of identity fraud unless you have taken an active step in terms of using that information to impersonate another person. Identity fraud requires that the information be used in order to gain some sort of benefit or cause disadvantage to the victim.

Identity theft and identity fraud are both ‘hybrid’ offences, meaning they can be prosecuted summarily or by indictment. Both are serious, but indictable offences tend to be more serious and can carry with them long prison sentences and other criminal consequences.

Examples

Some common examples of identity theft might include:

  • Taking someone’s wallet and using their ID to open a bank account in their name
  • Finding a credit card on the street and using it to purchase items for yourself
  • Stealing documents from a person’s home so that you can use them to forge their signature
  • After being involved in a car crash, providing a stolen driver’s license to avoid repercussions
  • Providing police with a false name and fake ID to avoid an arrest warrant in your name
  • Using your spouse’s credit card without their permission

Defences

Depending on the circumstances of any individual charge, there may be several defences available to a charge of identity theft and/or fraud.

They might include:

  • Charter arguments
  • Not done in a fraudulent manner
  • No fraudulent intent
  • Using a pseudonym

Punishment

Identity theft and identity fraud are both hybrid offences in the Criminal Code. This means that, depending on the individual facts and circumstances of each case, the Crown can elect to proceed by summary conviction or by indictment. While both are serious, and carry with them serious consequences upon conviction, summary offences are generally less serious. If the Crown proceeds summarily, the maximum punishment you can face is two years less a day in prison, or a fine of up to $5,000. There are also other possible consequences, such as a criminal record or subsequent court orders.

If the Crown instead chooses to proceed by indictment, the punishments are significantly more serious. For identity theft, you can face a maximum of five years in prison. For identity fraud, you face a maximum of up to ten years in prison. Again, as with summary conviction, you could also be left with a criminal record, which can impact your ability to work, travel, volunteer, or any number of other things.

If you are worried that you could be facing identity theft or fraud charges and want legal advice to know what to do next, the best course of action is to contact an experienced criminal defence lawyer. You can book a free consultation with Oykhman Criminal Defence online or over the phone to speak with a lawyer and get free legal advice.

Have you been charged with identity theft?

Our experienced team of criminal defence lawyers is standing by to help you fight the charge. Contact us today for a free, no-obligation consultation to discuss the specifics of your case and craft a formidable defence.

Call Now 1-866-939-5940

Overview of the Offence

S. 402.2 of the Criminal Code states the following:

Identity theft

402.2 (1) Every person commits an offence who obtains or possesses another person’s identity information with intent to use it to commit an indictable offence that includes fraud, deceit or falsehood as an element of the offence.

Trafficking in identity information

(2) Everyone commits an offence who transmits, makes available, distributes, sells or offers for sale another person’s identity information, or has it in their possession for any of those purposes, knowing that or being reckless as to whether the information will be used to commit an indictable offence that includes fraud, deceit or falsehood as an element of the offence.

Clarification

(3) For the purposes of subsections (1) and (2), an indictable offence referred to in either of those subsections includes an offence under any of the following sections:

(a) section 57 (forgery of or uttering forged passport);

(b) section 58 (fraudulent use of certificate of citizenship);

(c) section 130 (personating peace officer);

(d) section 131 (perjury);

(e) section 342 (theft, forgery, etc., of credit card);

(f) section 362 (false pretence or false statement);

(g) section 366 (forgery);

(h) section 368 (use, trafficking or possession of forged document);

(i) section 380 (fraud); and

(j) section 403 (identity fraud).

Jurisdiction

(4) An accused who is charged with an offence under subsection (1) or (2) may be tried and punished by any court having jurisdiction to try that offence in the place where the offence is alleged to have been committed or in the place where the accused is found, is arrested or is in custody. However, no proceeding in respect of the offence shall be commenced in a province without the consent of the Attorney General of that province if the offence is alleged to have been committed outside that province.

Punishment

(5) Everyone who commits an offence under subsection (1) or (2)

(a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than five years; or

(b) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.

Identity fraud

403 (1) Everyone commits an offence who fraudulently personates another person, living or dead,

(a) with intent to gain advantage for themselves or another person;

(b) with intent to obtain any property or an interest in any property;

(c) with intent to cause disadvantage to the person being personated or another person; or

(d) with intent to avoid arrest or prosecution or to obstruct, pervert or defeat the course of justice.

Clarification

(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), personating a person includes pretending to be the person or using the person’s identity information — whether by itself or in combination with identity information pertaining to any person — as if it pertains to the person using it.

Punishment

(3) Everyone who commits an offence under subsection (1)

(a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than 10 years; or

(b) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.

Remember that in any criminal prosecution, the Crown bears the burden of proof. This means that it falls to the Crown to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that you committed the offence in question. To do so, the Crown must prove the actus reus and mens rea of the offence:

The Guilty Act (Actus Reus)

The actus reus is also known as the guilty act. This refers to the elements of the offence that correspond to actions.

The following make up the actus reus of identity theft:

  • The accused obtained and/or possessed the identity information of another person

For identity fraud, the actus reus components are the following:

  • The accused impersonated another person or used their information;
  • That person was living or dead;

The Guilty Mind (Mens Rea)

The mens rea of an offence, often called the guilty mind, refers to the mental element of the crime, usually meaning the ‘intent’ or ‘motive.’

Identity theft, includes the following components:

  • The accused intended (or could be reasonably inferred to have intended) to use the identity information above to commit an indictable offence.
  • The indictable offence includes fraud, deceit, or falsehood as an element of the offence

For identity fraud, the mens rea includes the following:

  • The impersonation was done in a fraudulent manner;
  • The impersonation was done for one of the following reasons:
    • To gain advantage for themselves or another person;
    • Obtain property;
    • Cause disadvantage to the person being impersonated; or
    • Avoid arrest or prosecution.

Are you being investigated by the police for a criminal offence?

Learn about precharge legal advice and how it can help you to avoid being charged with a criminal offence in the first place.

Watch Video

Defences

There are several defences available to an identity theft or identity fraud charge. Whether or not a particular defence is available will, however, depend on your individual circumstances.

Charter Defences

If any of your Charter rights were breached during your arrest or at any other point during the investigation, an experienced criminal defence lawyer may be able to have evidence against you excluded. The most common breach for an identity theft charge would be a s. 8 breach, your right against unreasonable search and seizure. If police searched you, your home, or your car without justification, you may be able to have that evidence excluded. Contact a defence lawyer to find out more.

No fraudulent intent

This defence might arise in a situation where the police misunderstand the scenario, and arrest you for using someone’s identity or information even though you had it by accident. This would most likely come about if you had a friend/spouse’s ID on your person or in your vehicle, without intending to use it for anything. Perhaps you found a friend’s wallet in your vehicle and they, thinking it had been stolen, reported it to the police. You could argue that you did not intend to use that ID for any fraudulent purpose.

Identity fraud was not done in a fraudulent manner

The identity fraud offence requires that you use the ID in a fraudulent manner in order to be convicted. Depending on the circumstances, you could argue that you were not purporting to be another person for any fraudulent reason.

Using a pseudonym

Importantly, the identity fraud provision states that the person whose identity has been stolen must be living or dead. This means that, for the purposes of identity theft/fraud, using a pseudonym or a fake name is not a crime. This may be relevant depending on the circumstances of your charge.

Punishment

As mentioned above, identity theft and identity fraud are both hybrid offences, meaning it is at the Crown’s discretion as to whether they proceed by summary conviction or by indictment. While both are serious, indictable offences are much more serious and carry with them harsher penalties.

If the Crown proceeds summarily, the maximum penalties you can face are up to two years in prison, and/or a fine of up to $5,000. In contrast, when proceeding by indictment, the punishments become more severe. For identity theft, the maximum becomes five years in prison, while for identity fraud, it becomes ten years. No matter how the Crown proceeds, however, you may face other significant consequences, such as a criminal record. This can impact your ability to work, volunteer, or potentially travel.

The punishment the Crown seeks in any given case will depend heavily on the facts.

Frequently Asked Questions

How do you check if your identity has been stolen?

Becoming aware of identity theft will often depend on the type of information that the thief has stolen. In general, however, you want to remain alert and keep tabs on your information. Keep an eye out for any emails that state a password, or any other account detail has been changed without your knowledge. Many websites and online services will alert you whenever a device has attempted to log in to your account. Additionally, never share your passwords or other account information with other people. Physical identity information, such as a driver’s license or credit card, may be stolen or photocopied so that the thief has all of the information needed. If you think account information may have been stolen, the best course of action will generally be to contact that website’s customer service and follow their recommendations. Make sure you contact them through an official website and/or phone number. If your driver’s license or another piece of ID has been lost or stolen, report it to the police immediately and contact your registry. If your credit card has been stolen, or you have noticed strange transactions on your credit card, contact your bank immediately to put a hold on the card.

How can your identity be stolen?

Your identity can be stolen in any number of different ways. For physical ID, it can be as simple as someone stealing your wallet/purse, but it might also be someone photocopying a credit card or driver’s license to use later. Some thieves use fake ATMs or card readers to steal a credit card’s information. Your online information can be subject to attacks from hackers or data leaks. If a hacker is able to get into one account, it may be easier for them to access others using that account’s information. Thieves employ a wide variety of other tactics to try and trick people into sharing account information, such as posing as customer service or tech support. Again, if something doesn’t feel right, hang up and contact that website/company through an official number.

Can you go to jail for identity theft?

Yes, you absolutely can go to jail for identity theft and identity fraud. Both identity fraud and identity theft are hybrid offences, meaning the Crown can proceed by indictment or summarily depending on the circumstances of the case. In either situation, however, you could face jail as a consequence on conviction. The maximum sentence is five years for identity theft, and ten years for identity fraud. Whether or not you might face jail as a consequence if you have been charged with identity theft/fraud will depend heavily on your individual circumstances. The type of identity information stolen, who the victims were, and/or how serious the intended fraud was.

Published Decisions

R v Gonzales, 2016 BCCA 436 (CanLII)

In this case, a BC man, Mr. Gonzales, pleads guilty to an identity theft charge. Mr. Gonzales was stopped by the police and found to have in his possession numerous identity documents belonging to other people, including debit cards and driver’s licenses. He had also attempted to cash a stolen cheque at this time. He was initially given an eight-month jail sentence, but appealed, seeking a shorter sentence. This case gives us important information on the court’s overall stance on identity fraud, namely that it is treated very seriously. The court states that identity-related offences pose serious risks to the community, and as such, the court will impose harsher sentences so that it can deter future offenders from committing identity-related offences. The courts also weigh criminal records heavily in these offences; if offenders have committed similar offences before, the courts are more likely to impose harsher penalties. The judge did find that the eight-month sentence was suitable in the end, but again because the court goes into detail as to what principles they look for when sentencing, this is an important case.

You can read the full decision here. 

R v Zhu, 2021 ABPC 252 (CanLII)

In this case, Mr. Zhu pleads guilty to a charge of identity theft. The Crown seeks a longer jail sentence of approximately three years, while the defence submits that six months is sufficient. Mr. Zhu was involved in two different schemes involving identity theft, where he claimed income tax returns using stolen information and obtained a total of $760,000. Mr. Zhu repaid the stolen money to CRA, and the court notes that he had been previously convicted of 11 other offences. The court identifies that in this case, the accused took advantage of the honesty of his victims (who believed they were applying for jobs) and the tax system is an aggravating factor. There are a number of mitigating factors present, however, and Mr. Zhu is sentenced to eight months.

You can read the full decision here.

R v Sureskumar, 2021 ONCJ 448 (CanLII)

In this case, an Ontario man, Mr. Sureskumar, was charged with identity theft and other charges related to a wire transfer. The accused worked at the bank in question, and after assisting an elderly customer, allegedly obtained his account information to try and defraud him later. Mr. Sureskumar tried to have some of the evidence against him excluded through a Charter application, but was unsuccessful, as the judge found no breaches of his s. 8 or s. 10(b) rights. Thus, Mr. Sureskumar was convicted of identity theft.

You can read the full decision here.

About The Author

Michael Oykhman

Managing Partner

Michael Oykhman is a senior lawyer and founder of Oykhman Criminal Defence, a full-service criminal law firm with central law offices across Western Canada and Ontario.

My professional experience consists of countless court appearances and thousands of successful defences and satisfied clients. Over the last 10 years, I have worked to build a law office where all the lawyers share our collective experience, resources, and passion to help people. Our team approach to legal representation is client–rather than only law–centered. We look for opportunities to add value to our clients through strategic thinking and creative solutions.

Ask A Question

We endeavor to respond to questions within 24 hours. If your matter is urgent, please call our office or submit a request for a free consultation.

Client Reviews

Michael Oykhman is a very professional lawyer and the first time I spoke to him he asked about my situation and he gave me some very helpful advice and assistance and also told me his odds of winning this case. During the days I was in contact with micheal I could feel the level of professionalism of him and his team, he is able to respond back to you with any questions you have within 24 hours. In the end he was as successful in helping me win my case as he had initially promised me.If you are still struggling to find a lawyer, I highly recommend Michael Oykhman.

R.W.

Please give yourself a favour and contact Mr. Michael Oykhman if you need any legal advice or if you are in a terrible situation. Even-tough, the odds are not in your favour, still they will go extra miles to help you out in bad situation and get you favourable outcome. Moreover, They will work on your file even after the business hours. I don’t have words to say thanks to Mr. Michael oykhman and Kiran Cheema who had worked on my file and get me out of trouble. I’m very grateful for your assistance and exceptional service. HIGHLY RECOMMENDED.

Y.

I am grateful that Ms. Moira McAvoy was my lawyer, and I remain thankful to her for everything. She made a successful resolution to my case possible. Ms. Moira McAvoy is a professional, trustworthy lawyer, and a compassionate person. She is an excellent listener and knowledgeable of the law. From the start, she was an excellent guide. I did not know anything about the legal system and court, and she outlined everything clearly in advance, so I could understand things. She never rushed me through anything. She spoke clearly, explained everything, considered what I said, and provided options and advice. She kept me up to date on new information, requirements, and deadlines. She was always positive and this helped so much.

C.S.

Ryan Patmore and his team are simply the best. I was bullied by CPS in 2020 and it landed me with three separate charges, assault, refusal to blow and DUI, which all went down as I was parked at a friends. After some research and a conversation with Michael, he directed me towards Ryan and at the time I didn’t know that would be a game changer in my favour! He is honest, transparent, helpful and a brilliant mind. He successfully appealed my license suspension with ATSB and then proceeded to get the crown to dismiss all my charges before trial. I never had to step foot inside a courtroom. If you are in need of a criminal defence lawyer, don’t think twice, get in touch with this firm and ask for Ryan Patmore! The guy is an absolute saviour.

A.P.

Joseph Beller, from the very beginning when I first contacted and then retained Joseph as my representative I felt I was in good hands. When I emailed him with a question. I got a prompt response. We communicated often on the phone as needed. Joseph kept me informed as to the process. He made sure I knew all the potential results so I knew and could plan for the different outcomes. I know this his his job. But appreciate his professionalism and also his ability to not make me feel any extra stress. Well done.

N.B.
READ OUR REVIEWS
GET A FREE CONSULTATION