What does making an “election” mean?
In criminal trials there are two types of election: the Crown Prosecutor’s election, and the defence’s election.
When an accused is charged with a hybrid offence, the Crown Prosecutor can elect to proceed by way of indictment and seek jail time in the event of conviction, or they can elect to proceed summarily. When the Crown proceeds by way of summary conviction, the matter will be heard before the provincial court and the defence will not have an election.
The defence makes an election when the Crown proceeds by indictment. In this instance the defence will be able to choose whether their matter will be heard before the provincial Court, or whether it will be heard before the superior court. Where the defence elects to have their trial heard before the superior court, they will also have the right to chose whether they would like the trial to be heard before a judge and a jury, or a judge alone.
Whether it would be more beneficial to proceed to trial with judge alone or with a judge and a jury will depend heavily on the unique circumstances of your case. For example, it may be favorable to proceed by judge alone in instances where the verdict turns on highly technical points of law that may be difficult for people without a legal background to grasp. However, there are great benefits to having a jury decide the outcome of a trial. Not only will a jury not be subject to the same individual biases that a single judge may have, but the Prosecutor will have to convince 12 people of the accused’s guilt, rather than just one. However, whether in your case it is more beneficial for you to proceed to trial with a judge and jury or with a judge alone is a decision that should be made in consultation with your criminal defence lawyer.
An exception to these customary choices in the mode of trial are for those offences that, according to the Criminal Code, are the most serious offences under Canadian criminal law. Among them are murder, treason, and terrorism offences. Unlike indictable offences where an accused has a right to be tried before a judge alone, these offences must be tried by a jury unless the Crown consents to a trial by judge alone.
About The Author
Ask A Question
We endeavor to respond to questions within 24 hours. If your matter is urgent, please call our office or submit a request for a free consultation.
Michael Oykhman is a very professional lawyer and the first time I spoke to him he asked about my situation and he gave me some very helpful advice and assistance and also told me his odds of winning this case. During the days I was in contact with micheal I could feel the level of professionalism of him and his team, he is able to respond back to you with any questions you have within 24 hours. In the end he was as successful in helping me win my case as he had initially promised me.If you are still struggling to find a lawyer, I highly recommend Michael Oykhman.
Please give yourself a favour and contact Mr. Michael Oykhman if you need any legal advice or if you are in a terrible situation. Even-tough, the odds are not in your favour, still they will go extra miles to help you out in bad situation and get you favourable outcome. Moreover, They will work on your file even after the business hours. I don’t have words to say thanks to Mr. Michael oykhman and Kiran Cheema who had worked on my file and get me out of trouble. I’m very grateful for your assistance and exceptional service. HIGHLY RECOMMENDED.
I am grateful that Ms. Moira McAvoy was my lawyer, and I remain thankful to her for everything. She made a successful resolution to my case possible. Ms. Moira McAvoy is a professional, trustworthy lawyer, and a compassionate person. She is an excellent listener and knowledgeable of the law. From the start, she was an excellent guide. I did not know anything about the legal system and court, and she outlined everything clearly in advance, so I could understand things. She never rushed me through anything. She spoke clearly, explained everything, considered what I said, and provided options and advice. She kept me up to date on new information, requirements, and deadlines. She was always positive and this helped so much.
Ryan Patmore and his team are simply the best. I was bullied by CPS in 2020 and it landed me with three separate charges, assault, refusal to blow and DUI, which all went down as I was parked at a friends. After some research and a conversation with Michael, he directed me towards Ryan and at the time I didn’t know that would be a game changer in my favour! He is honest, transparent, helpful and a brilliant mind. He successfully appealed my license suspension with ATSB and then proceeded to get the crown to dismiss all my charges before trial. I never had to step foot inside a courtroom. If you are in need of a criminal defence lawyer, don’t think twice, get in touch with this firm and ask for Ryan Patmore! The guy is an absolute saviour.
Joseph Beller, from the very beginning when I first contacted and then retained Joseph as my representative I felt I was in good hands. When I emailed him with a question. I got a prompt response. We communicated often on the phone as needed. Joseph kept me informed as to the process. He made sure I knew all the potential results so I knew and could plan for the different outcomes. I know this his his job. But appreciate his professionalism and also his ability to not make me feel any extra stress. Well done.